Numerical investigation of CO2 solubility trapping mechanisms for enhanced storage in saline aquifers

Authors

  • Zeeshan Tariq Energy Resources and Petroleum Engineering, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Thuwal 23955-6900, Saudi Arabia
  • Jose Kevin Pauyac Estrada Energy Resources and Petroleum Engineering, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Thuwal 23955-6900, Saudi Arabia
  • Bicheng Yan Energy Resources and Petroleum Engineering, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Thuwal 23955-6900, Saudi Arabia
  • Jianchun Xu Key Laboratory of Unconventional Oil and Gas Development, China University of Petroleum (East China)), Qingdao 266580, P. R.China
  • Youwei He State Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610000, P. R. China

Keywords:

Numerical simulation, geological carbon storage, solubility trapping, WAG injection,complex reservoirs

Abstract

Geological Carbon Storage (GCS) faces significant challenges related to the potential leakage of CO2 through cap rocks, posing risks of contamination to drinking resources and disruption to various ecosystems. Therefore, it is essential to develop and implement optimal injection strategies to minimize CO2 escape from the formation. This study evaluates the effectiveness of three distinct CO2 injection strategies in complex saline aquifers: pure supercritical CO2 (SC-CO2), carbonated water (CW), and Water-Alternating-Gas (WAG). The results demonstrate that SC-CO2 injection primarily relies on structural trapping, complemented by residual trapping and a minor contribution from solubility trapping. In contrast, CW injection significantly enhances solubility trapping to nearly complete levels, while structural and residual trapping are minimized. On the other hand, WAG injection strategies, characterized by varying cycle frequencies, exhibit a balanced trapping profile, with solubility trapping progressively increasing while maintaining structural and residual mechanisms to support overall storage. Previous studies have shown that SC-CO2 injection efficiently fills pore spaces and displaces resident brine within the storage formation. However, the buoyant nature of CO2 remains a challenge to secure long-term storage efficiency. CW injection emerges as a promising alternative by leveraging the solubility of CO2 in resident brine. Dissolving CO2 in water prior to injection mitigates gravity segregation between brine and CO2, thereby improving volumetric sweeping efficiency within the formation. Additionally, WAG injection offers potential benefits by dynamically alternating SC-CO2 and water phases to enhance trapping and immobilization. Nevertheless, both CW and WAG injection strategies face challenges related to operational costs. CW injection requires a substantial volume of water to dissolve CO2, while WAG injection demands meticulous monitoring and precise control, resulting in increased energy consumption-particularly when highly compressed CO2 is needed. These factors collectively contribute to the elevated cost of CW and WAG injection strategies, highlighting the need for further optimization to enhance their economic viability.

Document Type: Original article

Cited as:

Tariq, Z., Estrada, J. K. P., Yan, B., Xu, J. Numerical investigation of CO2 solubility trapping mechanisms for enhanced storage in saline aquifers. Computational Energy Science, 2024, 1(4): 175-187. https://doi.org/10.46690/compes.2024.04.03

References

Alkan, H., Rivero, F. F., Burachok, O., et al. Engineering design of CO2 storage in saline aquifers and in depleted hydrocarbon reservoirs: Similarities and differences. First Break, 2021, 39(6): 69-80.

Agarwal, R. K.,  Zhang, Z.  Optimization of CO2 sequestration in saline aquifers. Rijeka, Claudia, IntechOpen, 2014.

Ajayi, T., Gomes, J. S., Bera, A. A review of CO2 storage in geological formations emphasizing modeling, monitoring and capacity estimation approaches. Petroleum Science, 2019, 16: 1028-1063.

Addassi, M., Omar, A., Ghorayeb, K., et al. Comparison of various reactive transport simulators for geological carbon sequestration. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2021, 110: 103419.

Alizadeh, A. H., Khishvand, M., Ioannidis, M. A., et al. Multi-scale experimental study of carbonated water injection: An effective process for mobilization and recovery of trapped oil. Fuel, 2014, 132: 219-235.

Burton, M., Bryant, S. L. Eliminating buoyant migration of sequestered CO2 through surface dissolution: implementation costs and technical challenges. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 2009, 12(3): 399-407.

Bryant, S. L., Lakshminarasimhan, S., Pope, G. A.   Buoyancy-dominated multiphase flow and its effect on geological sequestration of  CO2.  SPE Journal, 2008, 13(4): 447-454.

Bisweswar, G., Al-Hamairi, A.,  Jin, S.  Carbonated water injection: an efficient EOR approach. A review of fundamentals and prospects. Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology, 2020, 10: 673-685.

Celia, M. A., Bachu, S., Nordbotten, J. M., et al.   Status of CO2 storage in deep saline aquifers with emphasis on modeling approaches and practical simulations. Water Resources Research, 2015, 51(9): 6846-6892.

Duan, Z., Sun, R., Zhu, C.,  et al.   An improved model for the calculation of CO2 solubility in aqueous solutions containing Na+, K+, Ca2+, Mg2+, Cl-, and  SO42-. Marine chemistry, 2006, 98(2-4): 131-139.

Esene, C., Rezaei, N., Aborig, A., et al.  Comprehensive review of carbonated water injection for enhanced oil recovery. Fuel, 2019, 237: 1086-1107.

Foroozesh, J., Dier, M. A.,  Rezk, M. G. A simulation study on CO2  sequestration in saline aquifers: Trapping mechanisms and risk of CO2 leakage. MATEC Web Conferences, 2018, 225: 03004.

Foroozesh, J.,  Jamiolahmady, M. The physics of CO2 transfer during carbonated water injection into oil reservoirs: From non-equilibrium core-scale physics to field-scale implication. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2018, 66: 798-805.

Grobe, M., Pashin, J. C.,  Dodge, R. L. Carbon dioxide sequestration in geological media-state of the science. Tulsa, USA, American Association of Petroleum Geologists, 2009.

GLOBAL CCS institute. Capturing carbon dioxide (CO2) is the first step in carbon capture and storage (CCS), a suite of technologies that prevents large quantities of  CO2 from being released into the atmosphere. GLOBAL CCS institute 2023.

Holt, T., Lindeberg, E.  Thermal power-without greenhouse gases and with improved oil recovery. Energy Conversion and Management, 1992, 33(5-8): 595-602.

Hassanzadeh, H., Pooladi-Darvish, M., Keith, D. W.  Accelerating CO2 dissolution in saline aquifers for geological storage  Mechanistic and sensitivity studies. Energy & Fuels, 2009, 23(6): 3328-3336.

Jikich, S. A., Sams, W. N., Bromhal, G., et al. Carbon dioxide injectivity in brine reservoirs using horizontal wells. In National Energy Technology Laboratory, United States Department of Energy (eds) Proceedings for the 2nd national conference on carbon sequestration, 2003: 5-8.

Leonenko, Y., Keith, D. W. Reservoir engineering to accelerate the dissolution of CO2 stored in aquifers. Environmental science & technology, 2008, 42(8): 2742-2747.

Miguel, C. V., Mendes, A.,  Madeira, L. M.  An overview of the Portuguese energy sector and perspectives for power-to-gas implementation. Energies, 2018, 11(12): 3259.

Motie, M.,   Assareh, M.  CO2 sequestration using carbonated water injection in depleted naturally fractured reservoirs: A simulation study. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2020, 93: 102893.

Nghiem, L., Shrivastava, V., Kohse, B., et al. Simulation of trapping processes for CO2 storage in saline aquifers.  Paper  PETSOC 156 Presented at Canadian International Petroleum Conference, Calgary, Alberta, 16-18 June, 2009.

Orr, L.  Carbon capture and sequestration: where do we stand. Global Climate & Energy Project, NAE/AAES Convocation, Washington DC, 19 April, 2010.

Peaceman, D. W.   Representation of a horizontal well in numerical reservoir simulation. SPE Advanced Technology Series, 1993, 1(1): 7-16.

Parkhurst, D. L.,   Appelo, C. A. J. Description of input and examples for PHREEQC version 3-A computer program for speciation, batch-reaction, one-dimensional transport, and inverse geochemical calculations, edited by D. L. Parkhurst and C. A. J. Appelo, U.S. Geological Survey Techniques and Methods, New York, pp. 497,  2013.

Raza, A., Gholami, R., Rezaee, R., et al.  Significant aspects of carbon capture and storage-A review. Petroleum, 2019, 5(4): 335-340.

Society of Petroleum Engineers. The 11th Society of Petroleum Engineers Comparative Solution Project: Problem Definition. Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2023.

Sohrabi, M., Riazi, M., Jamiolahmady, M., et al.  Carbonated water injection (CWI)-A productive way of using CO2 for oil recovery and  CO2 storage. Energy Procedia, 2011, 4: 2192-2199.

Sohrabi, M., Riazi, M., Jamiolahmady, M., et al.   Carbonated water injection for oil recovery and CO2 storage. In Sustainable energy UK conference: Meeting the science and engineering challenge, Oxford, UK, 2008.

Sadati, E. Y., Sahraei,  E., Rahnema, M.,  et al.  The effect of CO2-enriched water salinity on enhancing oil recovery and its potential formation damage: an experimental study on shaly sandstone reservoirs. Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology, 2020, 10: 3791–3802.

Spycher, N., Pruess, K.,  Ennis-King, J.   CO2-H2O mixtures in the geological sequestration of  CO2. I. Assessment and calculation of mutual solubilities from 12 to 100 C and up to 600 bar. Geochimica et cosmochimica acta, 2003, 67(16): 3015-3031.

Tariq, Z., Yildirim, E. U., Gudala, M., et al.   Spatial-temporal prediction of minerals dissolution and precipitation using deep learning techniques: An implication to Geological Carbon Sequestration. Fuel, 2023, 341: 127677.

Vilarrasa, V.,  Rutqvist, J.   Thermal effects on geologic carbon storage. Earth-science reviews, 2017, 165: 245-256.

Zamani, N., Oldenburg, C. M., Solbakken, J., et al.  CO2 flow modeling in a coupled wellbore and aquifer system: Details of pressure, temperature, and dry-out. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2024, 132: 104067.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2024-10-16

Issue

Section

Articles